Private number calling

Private number calling…

Don’t you hate that?

I really dislike picking up calls that have the number withheld. Most of the time it’s cold calling or other junk calls. Maybe I am just getting old but I don’t remember so many legitimate companies withholding their number when contacting existing customers or people they have an actual relationship with. So in my memory it used to be easy to say “oh I wouldn’t deal with companies that do that all the time..”

These days it doesn’t seem to be an option. In the last two days I’ve received four calls with withheld number and they were all calls that I wanted to receive. Not taking two of them would have caused me considerable difficulties. Two were from British Gas about our Landlords’ Safety inspection, one was from a bank and another was from a financial services company.

I suspect if I could be bothered to ask why they use withheld numbers they’d say it’s because they don’t want people calling back directly, which is fair enough, but surely there is a better way to do this? Didn’t companies used to use presentation numbers that showed the main customer services number or something?

I’d like to see that taken a step further in fact, because it seems to me that if you can use a presentation number then couldn’t the phone come with (and update) a database of known presentation numbers? So that when British Gas calls, instead of saying the number of what will be some call centre in the middle of nowhere, it says:

British Gas Customer Services

even if I have never saved that number in my phone?

Web developers who don’t understand how email works

More annoying that companies who don’t believe ‘+’ in an email address is valid, are ones that did until their site got redesigned, leaving you unable to log in and having to explain the problem to people that can only read scripts. I’m looking at you, MBNA.

Update:

  CustomerService@MBNA.co.uk
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:
    <CustomerService@MBNA.co.uk>:
    host mbna.co.uk.s7a1.psmtp.com [64.18.6.14]: 554 No
    relaying allowed - psmtp

Update:

From: autoreply@customerservice.mbna.co.uk
Subject: Customer Service Reply

Thank you for replying to this email.

Any emails sent to this inbox are not
responded to. If you have a query about
your account please check your account
details online.

Abbey Anger

This is a really long rant about Abbey business banking. If you have no interest in such a thing or are already convinced of the incompetence of Abbey / Santander Group then there is probably no point in reading further.

Bitfolk‘s business account is and has always been with Abbey business banking. The initial account opening back in early 2007 was very quick and painless being almost entirely done over the phone, but getting access to the online banking proved to be a bit more difficult (and it seems I was not the only one).

For a start, they wanted my three security answers posted to them by normal mail. This did not seem very secure, but I did it anyway. After a couple of weeks it still wasn’t working, giving the useful message of bean error not found within scope, so I had to call customer services. They wanted me to post the details again, but I wasn’t willing to do that so after a great deal of persuasion they eventually agreed to accept a fax.

After a few more days, still with the same error, I had to call again. They wanted me to fax again saying that maybe it had got lost! I faxed again. It “got lost” again. I called again and demanded to be able to give the details over the phone or the account would be closed.

This almost worked! They apparently input my mother’s maiden name incorrectly, as every time it would ask that question I would always get it wrong. If I reloaded then it would ask another of the three questions, so I was still able to use the service. Given the pain experienced so far, I preferred that to speaking to customer services yet again.

Fast forward to yesterday, Monday 8th December 2008. I go to log in and Abbey (well, Santander, I assume) have changed things. In order to transition to the new online banking system I have to give my mother’s maiden name, and of course it does not work. Oh no, time to bang my head against the customer services wall.

Inevitably the phone lines were incredibly busy. I was on hold for over 45 minutes before I got to speak to a human. She took my name, date of birth, account number, business name, debit card number, expiry, recent transaction history and account number (twice). In between doing this she went away several times for 5 to 15 minutes at a time. By the end of all this I’d been on the phone for well over an hour only to be told that they “have no access to the old system at all.” I’d have to wait for some details to be posted to me again by normal post, and this would allow me to log in.

I pointed out that I needed access to the online banking to process payments from my customers, to which I was told, “oh, you can do that on the phone!” Well, not really no, not when it takes an hour to get to a human. I was then told that this was my fault for not sorting it out sooner.

I asked for the customer services representative’s name as I wanted to complain, and she just said, “Ashley.” I asked for her surname and she actually refused to give it to me! I was told that if I wanted to make a complaint then her first name and the time of the call would be sufficient.

I asked to speak to a supervisor and was again put on hold for around 10 minutes, after which time “Ashley” returned to inform me that no supervisors were available and all I could do was give her my phone number so that one would call me “before close of business tomorrow”! Meanwhile the paperwork had supposedly been put into first class post.

It’s now the next day. There was nothing in the post this morning from Abbey and I have as yet received no phone call from a supervisor. Their phone line is open until 9pm but I’m not calling it again at my expense and the chances of them calling me now seem slim.

This sort of delay with the post is expected near Christmas and is one of the reasons why doing this by post is unacceptable to me (the others being security-related, and the likelihood of a repeat of their shambolic handling of paperwork from before). The complete futility of calling customer service and the rudeness encountered even when making an effort to keep an even temper though is the really irritating thing.

It’s time to look for another bank.

Update December 15th, 2008:

It’s now a week on. I’ve received one of the three pieces of information I’m told I’ll need to use the online banking, so I’m now entering my second week without access. If it isn’t sorted out this week then I don’t think it will get sorted out in 2008. I’ve not received a phone call from anyone at Abbey.

Bitfolk was turned down for a Business Direct account with HSBC.

Update December 16th, 2008:

The remaining two pieces of information arrived today. I’m now able to log in. However I’m unable to do anything except look at the list of transactions since I keep getting the “Not authorised to perform this function” and “You currently have only one account linked to your card” errors. It says I have to call them. Great. At least I can now process payments from customers again.

NatWest have provisionally approved a Business Plus account and are sending me the paperwork.

Update December 17th, 2008:

Abbey got my business account working again this evening.

Meeting with Barclays on Friday about a business account.

Update January 9th, 2009:

Someone from Abbey’s complaints dept. phoned me and said he would look in to my complaint and that there may be some compensation for the inconvenience caused.

Don’t shop with Laptops Direct unless you enjoy marketing email and a hard sell

In the last year I have bought an Eee PC 900 and a Thinkpad R61 from laptopsdirect.co.uk. The purchase of the Eee PC went smoothly although I did get a call a few weeks later from someone who wanted to sell me an expensive additional warranty.

When I ordered the Thinkpad, I got a call back within a couple of hours saying that they had some “security problems” with my phone number. They claimed that my home phone number did not work. I knew I had input it correctly, and when I asked them to tell me what I had supposedly put in, I got a string of numbers that was too short to be a phone number and which I knew I had never put in myself. I gave them my correct number, and then immediately I was asked a number of sales questions.

They attempted to sell me Microsoft Office (I’m a Linux user), a “pre-delivery dead pixel check” for £39.99 (no thanks), a 3 year warranty for about £80 (I went with manufacturer’s warranty) and laptop insurance (covered by my home insurance). Each time I politely declined, the woman made comments like “oh, you’re just going to risk it then?” By the end of the call I was pretty annoyed and strongly got the impression that the original story about my phone number was a complete fabrication in order to get me on the phone for a hard sell.

Still, the goods were a fair price and arrived on time so apart from making a mental note to be wary of this in future, I forgot about it.

Today I have just received this email:

Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:18:20 +0100                                                                                                                                               
From: "Alice@AirConDirect.co.uk"                                                                                                                          
To: "[redacted]@[redacted]" <[redacted]@[redacted]>                                                                                             
Subject: End of Summer Sale - Further Reductions AND Free Delivery, Ends Sept 1st                                                                                                   
Reply-To: noreply@aircondirect.co.uk                                                                                                                                                
X-Mailer: aspNetEmail ver 3.1.5.0                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                                    
Hi,                                                                                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                                    
Summer's almost over and we are clearing out all our stocks of air conditioners with a further reductions off sale prices AND FREE DELIVERY to boot.                                
                                                                                                                                                                                    
Offer must end 1st September so click on the link below to see what difference the final reductions make to our prices.                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                                    
http://[redacted]/email_shots/summersale.html                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                                                    
Alice Taylor                                                                                                                                                                        
AirCon Direct Advisor                                                                                                                                                               
Tel - 0870 160 3191                                                                                                                                                                 
www.AirConDirect.co.uk                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                                                    
Prices and titles correct at the time of sending e-mail and are subject to availability.                                                                                            
You are receiving this email as a previous customer of                                                                                                                              
Laptops Direct / Appliances Direct / Direct TVs / Servers Direct / Acer Direct / AirCon Direct / Shop Targus.                                                                       
You are subscribed to the mailing list with the email address                                                                                                                       
If you have received this in error or would like to unsubcribe please email unsubscribe@aircondirect.co.uk with "unsubscribe" as the subject

At no point did I give my permission to Laptops Direct to pass my email address around as I have no desire to receive these (completely unrelated) “offers”. I realise that they are owning up to why I am receiving the email and have therefore not done anything illegal, but it is exceptionally rude in my opinion.

This together with the routine with the phone call have ensured that I will never shop from Laptops Direct again, nor any of the other companies listed above. Fortunately I had the presence of mind to use a tagged email address so I can now send mails to that address into oblivion.

I attempted to complain to Laptops Direct about this, but their web site contains no contact email address. They do have a web form. Here’s what happened when I submitted it:

Clownshoes.

Failclockers

From: Overclockers UK <mailinglist@overclockers.co.uk>
To: "andy@strugglers.net" <andy@strugglers.net>
Subject: Overclockers would like to hear from you!
X-Mailer: JMail 4.3.0 Free Version by Dimac

This mail cannot be read in a text only client.

They did include a text/html part though. Maybe that has what they want to hear from me about?

     _________________________________________________________________

   Reply with 'unsubscribe' in the subject to be removed from the mailing
   list
     _________________________________________________________________

Okay! Thanks Overclockers, will do.

Legal in UK to refuse to employ smokers?

Martin, yes it is legal:

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:Re-iYiInpP4J:www.marriottharrison.com/media/file/up/mh16-70.doc

I consider myself a non-smoker but this sort of policy would actually put me off working there. If they banned smoking breaks on work time, that would be okay. If they encouraged people to quit smoking, that would be okay. But this seems like an unwarranted intrusion into the employees’ personal lives.

I do wonder how they define “smoker” also. As I say I consider myself a non-smoker but I have probably smoked about 6 cigars in my life and probably will continue to do so at the rate of a couple per year at special occasions and such.

Thoughts on aggregators / planets

Just in case you are unaware, a planet in the blogging context is an aggregation of content from a list of individual sources such as blogs, journals, articles etcetera. Some examples of planets in no particular order:

Over the last couple of weeks there have been some heated words on various planets about what is acceptable content for that planet. I don’t run any of those planets so I’m not going to comment on specifics. I’ve also seen people who operate planets asking for people to join them, but only if they will post on a particular topic — in fact I’ve recently seen a request on a mailing list, which itself receives off-topic personal posts from members of its community, for bloggers who will only write on-topic posts on that community’s planet. And I’ve been added to planets which then later ask me to obey posting guidelines.

To me all this is very odd. I personally read various planets because I want to know more about the people who are in those communities and what they are up to. I appreciate the on topic posts they write but often I appreciate the slightly more personal ones even more. I like to see what people are interested in and what their values are, so to then restrict the posts to a particular topic to me seems to be counter-productive.

For the one planet that I do run, when I ask people if I can add them to it I sometimes receive the response, “Do you want me to use a tag?” or, “I’m sorry I don’t have a tag set up for this, you might get a lot of non-technical posts.” Great! If I was going to have expectations over what you are writing about then I would expect to be paying you to be a technical author for me. I don’t want that; I’m interested in what you are about.

Someone else said something like “in this day and age we have the technology to have the aggregator provide custom feeds with some people removed, and this is the way forward in dealing with people you really can’t stand to read”. I’m paraphrasing that, and I don’t remember who said it or where, but I couldn’t agree more. To me the planet is a view in to the community it represents and being a member of that community is usually all that is required to have a feed included. It does not mean that the planet operator endorses everything they say, that the reader should agree with their viewpoints or that the reader will find them an interesting person! We are presumably all grown-ups here and we can decide what to read or not.

If you are a paid blogger or if you want to make a name for yourself writing articles about a given subject then fair enough, I can understand why you might want to mark only certain articles for publication to a certain audience.

I don’t write much of value or anything contentious. I don’t write much at all, except links to strange things. I haven’t ever had a planet operator tell me that something I wrote wasn’t appropriate for their planet, but that’s probably because I’m not syndicated to many of them. But I would definitely ask to be removed before I would agree to tag posts.

Is it ever healthy to run an aggregator of personal blogs and then expect to exert editorial control over that?

Harassment of photographers

I’m getting increasingly disturbed by reports of members of the public being harassed whilst innocently taking photos. I’m going to start keeping a list of links to this sort of thing here.

See also: