Difference between revisions of "BiTfOlK"

From Strugglers
Jump to: navigation, search
(bitfolk: added reasoning)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - [[User:Matt|Matt]] (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
 
* I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - [[User:Matt|Matt]] (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
 
* Agreed, looks good with the two colours - [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]
 
* Agreed, looks good with the two colours - [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]
 +
* Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --~~
  
 
==More..?==
 
==More..?==
  
 
* bytewizer
 
* bytewizer

Revision as of 15:39, 20 January 2007

What should the casing be for bitfolk?

Evil griffer's decision is final obviously; terms and conditions apply.

Bitfolk

BitFolk

  • I like this one in written text - Matt

bitfolk

  • This one popey
  • I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - Matt (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
  • Agreed, looks good with the two colours - Dominic
  • Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --~~

More..?

  • bytewizer