Difference between revisions of "BiTfOlK"
From Strugglers
m (→bitfolk) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - [[User:Matt|Matt]] (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency) | * I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - [[User:Matt|Matt]] (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency) | ||
* Agreed, looks good with the two colours - [[User:Dominic|Dominic]] | * Agreed, looks good with the two colours - [[User:Dominic|Dominic]] | ||
− | * Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. -- | + | * Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --[[User:Taras|Taras]] 15:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
==More..?== | ==More..?== | ||
* bytewizer | * bytewizer |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 20 January 2007
What should the casing be for bitfolk?
Evil griffer's decision is final obviously; terms and conditions apply.
Bitfolk
BitFolk
- I like this one in written text - Matt
bitfolk
- This one popey
- I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - Matt (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
- Agreed, looks good with the two colours - Dominic
- Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --Taras 15:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
More..?
- bytewizer