Difference between revisions of "BiTfOlK"

From Strugglers
Jump to: navigation, search
(bitfolk)
m (bitfolk)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
What should the casing be for [http://bitfolk.com/ bitfolk]?
 
What should the casing be for [http://bitfolk.com/ bitfolk]?
 +
 +
Evil griffer's decision is final obviously; terms and conditions apply.
  
 
==Bitfolk==
 
==Bitfolk==
Line 13: Line 15:
  
 
* This one [[User:popey|popey]]
 
* This one [[User:popey|popey]]
 +
* I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - [[User:Matt|Matt]] (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
 +
* Agreed, looks good with the two colours - [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]
 +
* Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --[[User:Taras|Taras]] 15:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  
 
==More..?==
 
==More..?==
 +
 +
* bytewizer

Latest revision as of 15:40, 20 January 2007

What should the casing be for bitfolk?

Evil griffer's decision is final obviously; terms and conditions apply.

Bitfolk

BitFolk

  • I like this one in written text - Matt

bitfolk

  • This one popey
  • I like this one in logos with the two-colour design - Matt (Note: The reason that I don't like this one in written text is that it looks a bit odd when you use it to start a sentence - unless you then use Bitfolk for that case which means you then lack consistency)
  • Agreed, looks good with the two colours - Dominic
  • Er, this is the casing for use in written text, not in the logo. The logo is staying lowercase. --Taras 15:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

More..?

  • bytewizer