<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The ongoing struggle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog</link>
	<description>I'll get there one day.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.4-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Boris Johnson&#8217;s George W. Bush quote by Beau Bo D'Or</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/06/10/boris-johnsons-george-w-bush-quote/#comment-59446</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau Bo D'Or</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/?p=183#comment-59446</guid>
		<description>You will see that Boris has used a similar quote in anger in The Telegraph and I have amended the images to reflect this.
See my blog for the link to the Telegraph's article and the updated images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will see that Boris has used a similar quote in anger in The Telegraph and I have amended the images to reflect this.<br />
See my blog for the link to the Telegraph&#8217;s article and the updated images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You&#8217;d better&#8230; by Dominic</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58156</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58156</guid>
		<description>Oh. My. God.

Thank You so much for your quick reply, although I wish it wasn't so depressing! I don't think I helped myself by failing to keep a copy of the security information form - I've just requested a new one and was intending to return it to Abbey by fax, in line with what they suggested to both of us. However, reading of your experience, I have the mind to phone them up again and demand that they set up my online access over the phone. What an (ongoing) struggle! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. My. God.</p>
<p>Thank You so much for your quick reply, although I wish it wasn&#8217;t so depressing! I don&#8217;t think I helped myself by failing to keep a copy of the security information form - I&#8217;ve just requested a new one and was intending to return it to Abbey by fax, in line with what they suggested to both of us. However, reading of your experience, I have the mind to phone them up again and demand that they set up my online access over the phone. What an (ongoing) struggle! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You&#8217;d better&#8230; by Andy</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58150</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58150</guid>
		<description>Oh, and it is normal for it to display a "temporary error" page between about midnight and 3am every night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and it is normal for it to display a &#8220;temporary error&#8221; page between about midnight and 3am every night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You&#8217;d better&#8230; by Andy</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58149</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58149</guid>
		<description>Hi Dominic,

I waited and waited but it never got sorted out.  In the end I had to ring them and they insisted I fax them my security details again.  I did this.  Two more times.  They lost them every time.

In the end after 3 weeks of no access I demanded they set it over the phone.  They still got my mother's maiden name wrong so if that security question comes up I have to reload.  I'd rather do that than have to deal with the simians from Abbey again.

I think you're going to have to phone them.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dominic,</p>
<p>I waited and waited but it never got sorted out.  In the end I had to ring them and they insisted I fax them my security details again.  I did this.  Two more times.  They lost them every time.</p>
<p>In the end after 3 weeks of no access I demanded they set it over the phone.  They still got my mother&#8217;s maiden name wrong so if that security question comes up I have to reload.  I&#8217;d rather do that than have to deal with the simians from Abbey again.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re going to have to phone them.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You&#8217;d better&#8230; by Dominic</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/02/28/youd-better/#comment-58143</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy,

I came across this posting after googling "ANIB JSP Diagnostic Page" - I am receiving the exact same error as you describe above when I try to log onto my Abbey business account. It has been around two weeks since I returned the form detailing my security information, so maybe something is amiss. May I ask how long after returning your form it was before you were able to access your account online? Did you have to do anything to resolve the problem?

Many Thanks for your reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p>
<p>I came across this posting after googling &#8220;ANIB JSP Diagnostic Page&#8221; - I am receiving the exact same error as you describe above when I try to log onto my Abbey business account. It has been around two weeks since I returned the form detailing my security information, so maybe something is amiss. May I ask how long after returning your form it was before you were able to access your account online? Did you have to do anything to resolve the problem?</p>
<p>Many Thanks for your reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Hat-based Linux under Xen, from Debian Etch by darkfader</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/01/20/red-hat-based-linux-under-xen-from-debian-etch/#comment-55621</link>
		<dc:creator>darkfader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/01/20/red-hat-based-linux-under-xen-from-debian-etch/#comment-55621</guid>
		<description>there you go, fixed in xensource upstream but not sure if it made it in http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1068</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there you go, fixed in xensource upstream but not sure if it made it in <a href="http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1068" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1068</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Hat-based Linux under Xen, from Debian Etch by darkfader</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/01/20/red-hat-based-linux-under-xen-from-debian-etch/#comment-55619</link>
		<dc:creator>darkfader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/01/20/red-hat-based-linux-under-xen-from-debian-etch/#comment-55619</guid>
		<description>of course I hadnt come here just to bash debian...?! I just ran into this site while try to make pygrub work like everyone else; just at some point I got real angry about how many peoples time is spent on this; the libs are missing in the package and it should -obviously- just be fixed.

that aside, I think only rPath has actually bothered to fix the pygrub exploit, at least I didnt find much further references. There's a long way to go for pygrub anyway, it'll be interesting to see if the other grub features like tftp support or trusted grub extensions will go in at some point.

About the exploits nature, let's just say pygrub was very eager to execute domu:/boot/grub/menu.lst, so instructions could be crafted to run in dom0, without using overflows or such.

for shared hosting scenarios this is an obvious nightmare :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course I hadnt come here just to bash debian&#8230;?! I just ran into this site while try to make pygrub work like everyone else; just at some point I got real angry about how many peoples time is spent on this; the libs are missing in the package and it should -obviously- just be fixed.</p>
<p>that aside, I think only rPath has actually bothered to fix the pygrub exploit, at least I didnt find much further references. There&#8217;s a long way to go for pygrub anyway, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see if the other grub features like tftp support or trusted grub extensions will go in at some point.</p>
<p>About the exploits nature, let&#8217;s just say pygrub was very eager to execute domu:/boot/grub/menu.lst, so instructions could be crafted to run in dom0, without using overflows or such.</p>
<p>for shared hosting scenarios this is an obvious nightmare <img src='http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on obstler by Andy Millar</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/05/14/obstler/#comment-54195</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Millar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/?p=180#comment-54195</guid>
		<description>"technial difficulties" is a little mean...

1.1A at idle is ludicrous though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;technial difficulties&#8221; is a little mean&#8230;</p>
<p>1.1A at idle is ludicrous though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alan Keen, I take some of it back by The ongoing struggle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harassment of photographers</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2008/05/08/alan-keen-i-take-some-of-it-back/#comment-54171</link>
		<dc:creator>The ongoing struggle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harassment of photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/?p=178#comment-54171</guid>
		<description>[...] Write to your MP - Early Day Motion on public photography (UK) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Write to your MP - Early Day Motion on public photography (UK) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on haproxy bafflement by Michael</title>
		<link>http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/04/29/haproxy-bafflement/#comment-54070</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2007/04/29/haproxy-bafflement/#comment-54070</guid>
		<description>I came across this post in regards to haproxy but found it interesting because you were  load balancing spamd, something we have been doing for a number of years now using the above mentioned LVS + heartbeat solution. We are load balancing spamd connections across 8 backend servers and are processing ~100 million spam scans/month, so I can definitlyrecommend the above solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this post in regards to haproxy but found it interesting because you were  load balancing spamd, something we have been doing for a number of years now using the above mentioned LVS + heartbeat solution. We are load balancing spamd connections across 8 backend servers and are processing ~100 million spam scans/month, so I can definitlyrecommend the above solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
